SPACES

Icon

New art. Not old, used art.

Detour: Color Commentator Eleanor LeBeau on Artist Arzu Ozkal #8

Arzu Ozkal ad Eleanor LeBeau perform

THE ENDURANCE PERFORMANCE: DAY TEN

05.14.10

6:55 p.m.

(Arzu and I rehearsed with Meeko Israel, the bongo player, on Thursday night for about 90 minutes, but I didn’t have time to tell you about that.) Arzu and I head to SPACES’ warm, stuffy artist-in-residence quarters. Arzu begins transforming herself into The Actress while I circumnavigate a room, megaphone in hand, reciting my lines, exhausted but pulsating with nervous energy. Arzu emerges from the bathroom in full make-up, wearing lacy pink tights and the A-line white dress she used for her exhibition postcard. With one hand on her stomach, she confides that she’s now getting “really nervous,” although I tell her she appears calm and happy. She dives into a huge bag, pulls out the white grommet-belt and puts it on. “I look like Robin Hood,” she says, softly laughing. “A very retro, Diana Rigg-Avengers kinda Robin Hood,” I say.

7:17 p.m.

Arzu she throws me a coiled rope. I unfurl it and attach myself to her belt with a carabiner. Are we ready to climb mountains? As we test the rope’s resistance. Çigdem Slankard, the videographer, arrives. Arzu calls her “Chi” (spelling?). She retrieves another spool of rope and hands it to Chi, who, concerned about megaphone’s volume, is doing a sound check. Chi and Arzu decide where to attach Chi’s rope to the grommet-belt. I’m not exactly sure what happened next.

7:30 p.m.

Arzu leads Chi and I down the stairs and outside, onto the sidewalk in front of SPACES. The megaphone goes up in the air. Chi disappears. People are staring at us. We walk into the gallery, pushing our way through clusters of chatting people. I watch Arzu. I try to make eye contact with the audience. Baffled and slightly irritated faces stare back me. Arzu hands out the ropes. Some spectators refuse but thirteen accept the invitation to become participants. They have become binary terrorists. Chris Lynn is standing next to me. Then he’s gone. Meeko’s bongo-playing fades in and out. I hear the buzz of conversations. I’m getting tangled in the rope and worry about tripping. I’m worried about speaking too loud and not loud enough.

Next thing I know, Arzu is struggling to pull fifteen people, most of whom have no idea where she intends to go, into her exhibition space. She is slipping, slipping, slipping, slipping, falling on the wooden floor. She tries to get up once, twice, then falls on her knee. I try to help her up, then immediately I wonder if she wants me to do that. Later she will email to say that she has a bruise on her knee, and I will write back that I’m sorry and I hope it doesn’t hurt too much.

Now she’s in the corner of a gallery, facing the audience, her hands splayed on the walls. I stick the megaphone in her face and shout The Propositions. This—shouting in Arzu’s (I mean the Actress’s) face at close range while she’s in a submissive position— is difficult. I’m nauseous. Arzu breaks free and rushes to the opposite side of the gallery. Now she stands facing the wall, her back to the audience, in yet another submissive position. I say my final words and put down the megaphone. Arzu begins unhooking the participants’ ropes. I want her to hurry and release mine. When she does, I leave the space and walk out of the gallery, as we’d rehearsed.

Outside SPACES I take a deep breath. No one is around. I can still hear Meeko’s bongo playing. It goes on longer than we’d rehearsed. It keeps going. I knew it. I knew the ending we’d rehearsed was not the real ending. Liberated from the writer-critic’s gaze—from having to explain how the line produced the dot (in Bourriard’s formulation)—Arzu was free to create. But what was she doing? I fought the impulse to find out. Returning to the gallery was not the right thing to do.

By and by a woman steps out of the gallery. I can’t help myself. I ask her what Arzu is doing. “She’s just sitting on floor, staring into space. No one knows if the performance is over.” I ask the woman if Arzu is facing the audience. “Yes,” she says.

I smile and thank the woman for her information. I’m glad I asked. And glad that I didn’t return to watch Arzu.

11:04 p.m.

Arzu emails:

Gosh! I have a big bruise on my knee I hope we get together soon. We should keep in touch; it was awesome collaborating with you.

I tell Arzu that it was awesome collaborating with her, too.

Love at First Site

by

Anonymous, Arzu Ozkal and Eleanor LeBeau

The Scene is outside. Time is unspecified. The Commentator announces the Dramatis Personae.

The Commentator:
The Playwright
The Drummer
The Actress
The Audience
The Gallery
The Color Commentator
The Choreographer
The Rope

The Actress enters the gallery. She holds Ropes embedded with carabiners.

The Commentator:
This is the Actress.
She is a dot.
She holds the Line.
She stands on the Plane.
We are bound, by space, by constraints.
She gives me no further instructions.

The Actress binds the Audience to her. The Commentator watches in silence. When she is ready, the Actress signals Commentator to start speaking again.

The Commentator:
How does she work?
Does she make notes?
Does it happen all in her head?
We agree to email every morning and every night.

The Actress draws the line on a field
Connects the dots that pull at one another
In the scene she draws an audience, the space frames the Play
Dot extends to line, line becomes arc, arcs become figures.
More line, please! More line! I need more line! More line!

The Actress approaches her exhibition space.

The Commentator:
There are lots of oppositions to play with.

The Actress enters the exhibition space.

The Commentator:
She is in love.
We agree to email every morning and every night.

I am a commentator.
So everything I tell you—and everything I do not—is a decision
based on an infinite set of constraints and variables.
She is a binary terrorist
My terror is almost unmanageable.
Objectivity is a myth.
We agree to email every morning and every night.

The Actress dances around the exhibition space, pulling the Audience. She backs into a corner, facing the Audience, and the Commentator shouts at her.

The Commentator:
GIVEN:
AN ARTIST
AN ACTRESS IN SPACE
THREE CONSTRAINTS
A LINE CONNECTING DOTS
AN AUDIENCE
A DANCE
LOVE

The Actresss walks to a wall. When her back is to the audience, the Commentator speaks.

The Commentator:
“Every failure is a masterpiece,” she quotes. “I wonder if this might be the only masterpiece I ever make.”

The Actress disengages the Commentator’s Rope. The Commentator exits the exhibition space and the gallery.

Filed under: Detour: Color Commentary: Eleanor LeBeau on Arzu Ozkal, , , , , ,

Detour: Color Commentator Eleanor LeBeau on Artist Arzu Ozkal #7

THE ENDURANCE PERFORMANCE: DAY EIGHT

05.11.10

11:22 p.m.

Countdown: 45 hours to show time! At 6:22 p.m. I arrive at SPACES for performance rehearsal, script in hand. The Collaborator and I have rewritten four drafts. Actually s/he writes. I critique. S/he rewrites. An adorable Welsh Corgi-Beagle-Jack Russell Terrier greets me at the door. His shiny, wet nose has sawdust stuck to it. There’s a baby in a stroller. Three studio assistants, one perched on a ladder, are painting a wall. Tangled ropes and bicycles and assistants whizzing past, oh my. I step on oozing paint tubes.

Arzu immediately introduces me to her filmmaker friend, Çigdem Slankard, who will be videotaping “Love at first site” on Friday night. Arzu has been doing student crits all day at Oberlin but is energetic and anxious to begin rehearsal. The cute dog follows us, tail wagging. His name is Alphonso. Arzu is his human.

What follows, though, I cannot tell you, except to say that Arzu danced while I read a script. She also directed. Her goal tonight was to coordinate her choreography with my words. We ran through the script ten times, trying different things. Arzu grappled with two prop malfunctions, too. One prop was easily fixed, although the other will require considerable work tomorrow. Arzu must go to Home Depot tomorrow and then work, work, work. “This is all happening so fast that I just have to make a decision and go with it,” she says, wiping her brow. “There’s no time to second-guess.” I nod my head and laugh in agreement. (There’s no time for editing, either.)

About 8:40 p.m., we take a break and hit Kan Zaman on W. 25th St. We share hummus and fries. Our conversation careens from matters of the heart to bongos. Two dudes lounging at a nearby table suck on a hookah. We hear gurgling water but don’t smell anything. Can you tell I am rushed? (Sorry, no time for pictures.)

We return to SPACES for a few more run-throughs. We decide to end for the night. Untangling ropes, Arzu exclaims, “Sometimes I don’t want to be an artist anymore!” I laugh. “Sometimes I don’t want to be a writer, either,” I tell her.

We agree tomorrow at 6 p.m. for our final rehearsal.

Filed under: Detour: Color Commentary: Eleanor LeBeau on Arzu Ozkal, , , ,

Detour: Color Commentator Eleanor LeBeau on Artist Arzu Ozkal #4

 Images from Arzu's press release for "Relief valve,"on exhibit at the George Jones Memorial Farm in Oberlin from May 28-June 2.
Images from Arzu’s press release for “Relief valve,”on exhibit at the George Jones Memorial Farm in Oberlin from May 28-June 2.

THE ENDURANCE PERFORMANCE: DAY FIVE

05.09.10

9:52 a.m.; 3:19 p.m.; 5:26 p.m.

Arzu and I exchange emails. I don’t know if it’s a good idea to give you play-by-play commentary about today’s discussions. I suspect you may soon be grateful for my omissions, which I hope don’t frustrate you too much right now.

Arzu went to Home Depot today for “supplies,” although she didn’t say for what. Arzu rarely provides direct answers to my questions, only clues. I’m fairly certain she doesn’t have the time. Maybe she doesn’t want to. Arzu strikes me as a doer, not someone who talks about doing. Besides, what’s it like to be inundated with questions while you’re in the middle of creating something? The sound of a ringing phone feels like an electric shock when I’m writing. That said, perhaps my concerns about being too intrusive have made me a passive, overly self-reflexive commentator.

Today is Mother’s Day and I have several mothers. I am busy, too.

11:49 p.m.

Arzu’s latest email confirms something I’ve thought for several days now: She juggles multiple roles and projects with enviable equanimity. Monday is the start of Finals Week at Oberlin College, where she teaches “Design as Social Process” and “New Media Practices” and is currently dealing with art students in the throes of year-end deadlines. There are classes, office hours and Detour. Plus she’s curating an exhibition that opens in two weeks.  Here’s an excerpt from the press release she sent:

Relief Valve/Subap

Subap, 13 Türk sanatçının, ulusal ve uluslararası çevre ve çevre politikalarına cevaben ürettiği sanat eserlerinden oluşan bir sergi. Sanatçıların, fotoğraf, kısa video, performans ve yerleştirme gibi medyaları kullanarak küresel ısınma, çevre kirliliği, doğal tahribat, çölleşme ve genetiği değiştirilmiş gıdalar konularını ele alan çalışmalarını sunacakları sergi, 28 Mayıs – 2 Haziran tarihleri arasında George Jones Hatıra Çifliği’nde ziyaret edilebilir.

I’m intrigued by the Turkish alphabet (29 letters). I also want to know what these words sound like. Here’s the English version (slightly edited for length)

Relief valve: An exhibition of the work of thirteen artists whose work addresses environmental issues. Using a variety of media from photography and video to performance and installation, the selected art works provide insights into land use, biodiversity and the recent controversy over genetically modified foods in Turkey.

May 28- June 2, 2010
Location: George Jones Memorial Farm, Oberlin

For info: 440-775-8181
http://www.reliefvalve-subap.info/
The exhibition is curated by Arzu Ozkal and Nanette Yannuzzi-Macias.
Artists:

Yeni Anıt, Nazan Azeri, Burçak Bingol, Genco Gülan, Güneli Gün, Erhan Muratoğlu, Suat Öğüt, Ethem Özgüven, İz Öztat & Dikaran

Taş, A. Tufan Palalı, Mark Slankard, Eden Ünlüata

Tomorrow: Arzu’s first performance rehearsal at SPACES!

Filed under: Detour: Color Commentary: Eleanor LeBeau on Arzu Ozkal, Guest Bloggers, , , , ,

Detour: Color Commentator Eleanor LeBeau on Artist Arzu Ozkal #3

Lygia Clark, Sensory Masks, 1967

Lygia Clark, Sensory Masks, 1967

THE ENDURANCE PERFORMANCE: DAY FOUR

05.08.10: Composed throughout the day

9:29 a.m.
I email James Luna, who lives in SoCal. HELP! Please send advice about my upcoming performance score/script and possible live performance. [Addendum 05.11.10: Did you notice how fear prevented me from seeing beyond my own navel? And, most importantly, I’m not focusing on Arzu’s process. Pedagogical moment # 17.]

9:54 a.m.
As promised, Arzu sends her morning email:

Good morning!

I got some rope yesterday; will try a few things today. Will let you know how it goes. :)

Arzu

10:12 a.m.
I email Arzu to ask what she intends to do with the rope.

11:47 a.m.
Arzu responds by email:

Hi Eleanor,

Lygia Clark’s performance is an inspiration: Lygia Clark “Propositions,” 1966-1968.

Will write more tonight.

12:27 p.m.
Luna responds. The minimalist, as always, but right on point:

ELB

The moment you stand up and turn to the audience you are performing.
Communication can take many forms if you are not a public speaker. You can prerecord your statement, you can write it out, you can hand out notes or pass one around. Whisper to each one: Don’t do Bob, Bob did it…..
Think about how you would like to be communicated to.

Be yourself.

I have no idea as to subject. That is between you and the artist.

Mr. Luna

Lygia Clark, The I and the You: Clothing/Body'Clothing, 1967

Lygia Clark, The I and the You: Clothing/Body’Clothing, 1967

11:52 p.m.
All day I’ve been wondering how the work of Brazilian artist Lygia Clark (1920-1988) might influence “Love At First Si/ght/te.” Above you will find image-pathways that lead to some of Clark’s ideas. (Do you mind if I call her Lygia?) The trajectory of Lygia’s oeuvre in one sentence: She transitioned from Constructivist painting to sculpture to relational art (for lack of a better word) and finally to what has been called “therapy.”

She is not a household name in the U.S. (how many female visual artists are?), but very much respected in the art world. Maybe Lygia is not well known because her entire oeuvre thwarts fetishization of the object and thus presents major curatorial challenges. “She attempted to escape both the notion of artist as ‘genius,’ and the supremacy granted to the object which implicitly forces the viewer into a role of passive contemplation,” Juan Vincente Aliaga notes in a 1998 issue of frieze.

After 1965, she labeled all of her works “propositions”: a set of rules created by the artist, using easy-to-find props, that are activated (or “made”) by others. The propositions only exist in the “now” and cannot be documented or sold or exhibited post-activation. You should also know that many of Lygia’s propositions emphasize non-visual experience (auditory, kinetic, haptic, olfactory) and attempt to collapse the mind/body duality. Said another way, the maker of a proposition may have an experience that compels him/her to reconsider the way s/he’s been taught to think about the body/self. I don’t know for sure. I’ve never made a proposition. I’m only imagining. Indeed, Lygia, like Arzu, is binary terrorist who collapses dichotomies: mind/body; intellect/senses; objective/subjective; author/spectator; object/spectator and so on.

What does Arzu plan to do with the rope and elastic bands? Is she using other props that she’s not telling me about? Lygia’s propositions require the makers to wear plastic boiler suits and Mobius-strip handcuffs.

Is Arzu’s last email a proposition for you and me, the spectators? She’s set some parameters (or rules)—the performance’s title and Lygia Clark, for example—and now I use what I think I know so far about “Love At First Si/ght/te” to produce color commentary about Arzu’s artistic process.

Am I not making my own “Love At First Si/ght/te”?

Filed under: Detour: Color Commentary: Eleanor LeBeau on Arzu Ozkal, , , , , , , ,

Detour: Color Commentator Eleanor LeBeau on Artist Arzu Ozkal #2

Detour: LeBeau and Ozkal hash things out

Arzu and Eleanor discussed serious art matters on Friday night at the Social Prosperity Club in Tremont.

THE ENDURANCE PERFORMANCE: DAY THREE

05.07.08

6:33 a.m.

How is my play-by-play commentary going to influence the work-in-progress and the audience’s reception of it? Live art traffics in subterfuge and surprise and mystery and thwarted expectations. Performance is mischievous play that traps unwitting observers. Reader, if I tell you everything I know about the work before you experience it—if I fully explain what Bourriard calls “the line”—have I killed it for you? Will Arzu’s performance be DOA? Do I even want to know everything—or anything—about the work before it happens?

Writer’s Obstacle # 5:  My training as a journalist. Facts, facts, facts. Hah!

Should my play-by-play be a truthful document of Arzu’s artistic process?

5:28 p.m.

I get travel books about Turkey from the library. Arzu was born in Ankara, the capital city, and earned her B.A. in graphic design at a major university there. My knowledge about the country is limited, although a week or so ago I read Elif Batuman’s evocative “The Memory Kitchen: A chef rediscovers the foods that Turkey forgot” in the New Yorker’s April 19 issue.

“Turkey remains at the heart of the ideological battle between East and West,” the Lonely Planet Guide notes. Other books call Turkey “the bridge between East and West.” Although 98 percent of Turks are Muslim, the country is a secular state. Arzu’s 2003 Web site “A Daily Media Diary of Turkey” characterizes Turkey as not a bridge but a “screen” on which we can “watch the interplay among various oppositions”: secular vs. religious and East vs. West [http://tr-act.info/].

7:01 p.m. to 9:38 p.m.

Another dark and stormy night. I’m at the dimly-lit, wood-paneled Social Prosperity Club in Tremont, nursing a Bacardi and Diet Coke (uninspired, I know) while I wait for Arzu and her partner to arrive. (Her partner shall remain anonymous unless I decide otherwise.) I’m scribbling questions in my reporter’s notebook when Arzu and her partner appear at my table. I anxiously wait until they order (two beers and sweet potato fries) before I bombard Arzu with questions.

I begin with the “choreographer” tidbit Arzu fed me in yesterday’s email. Since our conversation bounced around like a spastic SuperBall, what I’m about to tell you about her work-in-progress was not relayed to me in the exact sequence you’re about to read. Bits and pieces were revealed here and there—either through direct questions or spontaneous statements—and then I cobbled them together for this narrative, which is my impression of the discussion.

Arzu first got the idea for the project while driving home from the SPACES meeting on Wednesday night. Now it’s growing and changing, even as she talks about it. The play or performance’s theme is “Love At First Site/Sight,” an ironic spin on either Arzu’s disinterest in or disdain for galleries. (I didn’t verify the spelling here—I’m just assuming it’s homonym wordplay.) The performance may or may not be one-night only. It will last three minutes or more and feature three characters or more: The Actress, The Playwright and The Choreographer. Arzu will be the Actress. The Choreographer is a French transfer student at Oberlin College who’s trained in classical ballet. She will choreograph “a dance or something” for Arzu.

Now, keep in mind that everything I tell you is mediated by my own “scopic regime.” Objective reportage is a myth. Objective journalism is a myth. Every decision about what to tell you, the reader, and what to withhold is a subjective decision based on worldview and experience and a gazillion other variables.

Arzu said she was going to purchase some elastic bands, although she didn’t say for what. I think Arzu is going to be what performance scholar Rebecca Schneider calls a “binary terrorist”—an artist whose work collapses binaries.  There are lots of oppositions to play with here: performer/audience, participant/observer and art-object/viewer.

At some point Arzu says, “I can see you as the Playwright.” I almost choke on my drink. Earlier she’d said, “I can see you reading your blog postings while I am performing.” Do these statements mean the same thing? Whatever the case, public speaking and performance terrifies me. I do it, but the terror preceding the performance is almost unmanageable. She gives me no further instructions, other than that I have to produce a three-minute (or longer) script. Freedom can be paralyzing.

I burst into maniacal laughter. We all burst into maniacal laughter.

“Deleuze and Guattari say that ‘Every failure is a masterpiece,” Arzu says, laughing. “I’m really afraid it might be the only masterpiece I ever make.”

We agree to email every morning and every evening.

Filed under: Detour: Color Commentary: Eleanor LeBeau on Arzu Ozkal, , , , , , , ,

Archives

Twitter

Delicious Bookmarks

Extras

Categories

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 40 other followers